Broadband Developments

January 6, 2009

Apple MacWorld 2009 - No Blockbusters Today

Filed under: BroadDev — Tags: , , — John Furrier @ 3:39 pm

From Reuters….Apple Inc said on Tuesday it was dropping copy protection from songs sold on the Internet and debuted its slimmest 17-inch laptop yet, but with no dramatic products or master pitchman Steve Jobs, the company’s final Macworld performance disappointed Wall Street.

Apple shares slid 0.7 percent, lagging by far the Nasdaq’s 1.7 percent gain, reflecting frustration over the lack of news from the trade conference that had previously introduced the iPhone to the world.

“There were some innovative products, but no true blockbusters,” said Robert Francello, head of equity trading for Apex Capital hedge fund in San Francisco. “People were bullish going into it, and now they’re kind of taking money off the table.”

Apple said its iTunes music store, which has sold 6 billion songs thus far, will offer its 10-million-song library free of digital rights management — or copy-protection — by the end of the quarter, for between 69 cents and $1.29 a song.

Songs will also be available straight to iPhones over the air, instead of through a computer.

The company decided not use Macworld to launch any major new product, as it had in past years, when it introduced such industry-changing devices as the iPhone.

In years past, the company’s Macworld product launches had produced so much buzz that they managed to overshadow events at the far larger Consumer Electronics Show. The 2009 CES show kicks off this week in Las Vegas.

Tuesday’s event produced few surprises. Apple announced a $2,799 17-inch laptop that is the company’s lightest and slimmest ever, as well as tweaks to software for home movies and photographs.

The event culminated with singer Tony Bennett crooning “The Best is Yet to Come” and “I Left My Heart in San Francisco” in a farewell of sorts to Apple, which will no longer attend the cultural event thronged annually by Mac-faithful.

Jobs, a fixture at past events, was nowhere in sight, despite some hopes for a cameo. Last month, the company said its chief executive and salesman extraordinaire would not deliver the Macworld address. That raised fresh concerns about the cancer survivor’s health and signaled to many Apple-watchers that the company had no plans to launch a major product at Macworld.

DNS Gurus Talk on Their New Podcast - “Ask Mr. DNS”

Filed under: BroadDev, Infrastructure 2.0, Podcasts — Tags: , , , — John Furrier @ 10:36 am

I just ran into this podcasts from the two gurus of DNS - Matt Larson and Cricket Liu.

For all you DNS junkies you’ll love this content from two old school DNS players.

Ask Mr. DNS Podcast

January 5, 2009

Unified Communications 2009 Outlook From UCStrategies Jim Burton

Filed under: BroadDev, UC — Tags: , , — John Furrier @ 12:27 pm

UCStrategies has a good post on the outlook for Unified Communications in 2009.  Some experts are saying that Unified Communications (and Web 2.0) are causing serious security issues for enterprises so I find that UCStrategies’ analysis is very compelling.  Here is the link to their outlook for 2009.

Jim Burton’s highlights on 2008
Industry consolidation started in 2007 but took shape in 2008. It takes time to integrate major acquisitions such as Cisco’s acquisition of WebEx and Mitel’s acquisition of Inter-Tel. It also takes time for companies that have changed their business model/ownership to reorganize, as has been the case with Avaya. By the end of this year, we have seen major changes and progress on the above examples. In 2008 we saw the Gores Group creating a joint venture/acquisition with Siemens’ Enterprise Communications group. As the market evolves, we will see more industry consolidation, which may include a few corporate failures. Nortel may be the first major casualty with a market cap under $150 million, as of this writing.

Vendor repositioning evolved in 2008, with vendors trying to differentiate their products and services earlier in the year. By year’s end many came to realize that this effort had confused customers and slowed down sales. And, along with the economic challenges, many have recognized that UC-U (integrating silos of communications) with its soft ROI was going to be more difficult to sell. They have started repositioning/promoting UC-B, (integrating communications into a business process) which often delivers a solid ROI in less than 12 months.

The success of several UC vendors during the past year is a good indication of which companies will become the market leaders. Cisco, IBM, and Microsoft all had good results in this emerging market in 2008. They are likely to become the industry leaders. But, there are others to watch. Avaya has gone through a major reorganization, and has repositioned its products and company. The new Siemens, which has always had a superior product, is now well-positioned after being acquired by the Gores group. NEC is another that should not be forgotten; the company has reorganized and placed an emphasis on providing end-user centric solutions

Biggest disappointments in 2008

Market confusion on the definition of UC is my single biggest disappointment. Vendors have tried to differentiate their offerings by using inappropriate definitions of UC. Many have rebranded existing products and added “UC” to the product description when they do not integrate with other UC components.

2. The industry has not focused on UC-Business Process - integrating communications into a business process. Vendors, the channel, and many consultants and analysts do not appear to have the knowledge to promote the most important part of UC - the part that provides the best ROI and can provide the enterprise with many other “hard” advantages, like improved customer service, competitive advantages and improved employee productivity.

3. The channel is slow to evolve from selling “boxes” to consultative selling. This is one of the biggest challenges for our industry and the vendors that can transition their channel first will become market leaders.

Outlook for 2009

I think it is important to look at what UC really is. It is a combination of integrating the silos of communications, and integrating communications into a business process (which of course is part of integrating silos of communications). With that in mind, it is easy to see that UC has a great future. All forms of communications may be changing, such as a shift from wired to wireless phones and voice messages to text messages, but they all still fall under the umbrella of what we now define as unified communications.

The overall outlook for UC is very good. UC can deliver great ROI. Even if you look at UC-U with a soft ROI, you can see that this may be an appropriate justification for investment in today’s troubled times. Historically a soft ROI showing a savings of 10 minutes per employee per week - that would equal a staff reduction of 10 people, has often been met with the question – so, who are the 10 people you’re going to lay off? Many companies made staff reductions - now we have a hard ROI, an opportunity to maintain productivity with less people. The big opportunity still lies with UC-B - a hard ROI plus an opportunity for companies to reform their business.

The secrets of UC success will come in several forms.
1. Enterprise and End-user education - the first key to success requires enterprise customers to understand unified communications. They need to know how to develop a UC strategy that looks at both UC-U and UC-B. They need to bring together telecom, IT and line of business managers to address the needs of various departments within the enterprise. They need to understand that UC is made up of many important communications components, and they need to look at all of them before they make a technology acquisition decision. They need to understand that while the PBX has historically been the center of corporate communications, it is now just one of the components.

2.  Channel education - the channel is responsible for selling and installing and servicing UC solutions. Most are used to selling boxes and are now challenged by selling solutions. This may be the biggest challenge for the industry.

3. Vendor positioning - vendors need to be consistent in their definition of unified communications. Many have confused the market and slow down the industry by trying to differentiate their products and services by having a slightly different definition than their competitors. The market will grow much faster if vendors, the channel, consultants, and analysts would all support a common definition for unified communications.

Security Updates from Andreas Antonopoulos RE: Web 2.0 and Unified Communications

Filed under: Podcasts, Security, UC, Web 2.0 — Tags: , , , , — John Furrier @ 10:06 am

I found this great podcast on the network world site today from Andreas Antonopoulos.  Things like Web 2.0 and unified communication applications as well as virtualization all make securing an enterprise network more difficult. Nemertes’ Andreas Antonopoulos explains how security policies and systems need to become more flexible to fit the new ways we work.

Click here for the podcast.

January 4, 2009

Dynamic Infrastructure: Infrastructure 2.0 Developing In The Enterprise

Filed under: BroadDev, Infrastructure 2.0 — Tags: , , , , — John Furrier @ 11:11 am

Greg Ness wrote a post over at Seeking Alpha on Infrastructure 2.0 or Dynamic Enterprise.

Over the last three decades the network has grown to a point of exhaustion for many enterprises, with critical projects being slowed by the demands of manual IT labor, from core network services like DNS/DHCP and IPAM (IP address management) to the new dynamic processing power potentials unleashed by virtualization and cloud computing. A report last fall by Computerworld showed large enterprises already experiencing diseconomies of scale (rising per unit IP address management costs as IP addresses are added), before even more endpoint and system movement and change is enabled by new initiatives designed to reduce costs and increase efficiency.

When you combine rising (manual labor) costs on a per IP address basis with the ongoing expansion of the network (more IP addresses) within the context of a global recession you have the makings of a wake up call for vendors and CIOs: a wake up call driven by rising operations expenses, increasing outages and fixed or even declining budgets as networks become more operationally significant.

Those who embrace the power of automation will crowd out those who fail to see the implications of new demands.

As the Infrastructure 2.0 meme spreads, there are four companies that are destined to lead: Cisco, F5 Networks, Microsoft (MSFT) and Infoblox (my employer). Within a couple weeks Cisco and Infoblox will share a stage at the San Jose Fairmont to talk about the biggest revolution in networking since TCP/IP. In a few months Cisco, F5 and Infoblox will address FIRE attendees on the dynamic infrastructure revolution. I mention Microsoft because it is the leader in endpoint operating systems and has been very vocal about its virtualization and cloud solutions.

Dynamic infrastructure will unleash new potentials in the network, from connectivity intelligence (dynamic links and reporting between networks, endpoints and applications) to the rise of IT automation on a scale that few have anticipated. It will unleash new consolidation potentials for virtualized data centers and various forms of cloud computing. It will enable networks to ultimately keep up with increasing change velocities and complexity without a concomitant rise in network management expenses and manual labor risks.

Further down the road there will be even more capabilities emerging from Infrastructure 2.0 as virtualization and cloud payoffs put more pressure on brittle Infrastructure 1.0 networks.

As networking vendors fight against stable or even declining enterprise IT budgets the automation of otherwise mundane, manual tasks that are driving up the expense of the network will stand out as the critical chasm between extinction and ongoing growth. The larger the payoff promised by dynamic systems and endpoints the greater the pressure on static networks managed by kludge and CIO shell games.

For static network hardware vendors, enterprises will simply stop upgrading their networks at their former pace because they won’t have the operations budgets to properly administer the new gear. And those CIO buyers will be squeezed by increasingly eroding business cases for their strategic network projects as peer companies continue to evolve and exploit the power of new initiatives. They will experience new initiative diseconomies as they throw more bodies at more changes and outages.

This “dynamic or dead” scenario will start with core network service automation, as Oltsik predicted and will enable breakthroughs in other areas, including IF-MAP and Service-Oriented Network Architecture (SONA ala Cisco) and Data Center 3.0. This is just the beginning.

« Older Posts

Powered by WordPress