<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s the Value of Unified Communications - It has To Be Business Innovation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://broaddev.com/2008/08/07/whats-the-value-of-unified-communications-it-has-to-be-business-innovation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://broaddev.com/2008/08/07/whats-the-value-of-unified-communications-it-has-to-be-business-innovation/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 11:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: sameer</title>
		<link>http://broaddev.com/2008/08/07/whats-the-value-of-unified-communications-it-has-to-be-business-innovation/#comment-386</link>
		<dc:creator>sameer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 20:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broaddev.com/?p=140#comment-386</guid>
		<description>Hey John
"I see the “presence” issue being a big problem to advancing the Unified Communications area."

Can you expand on this? 

Whilst its early pickings and certainly not comprehensive (VOIP etc) there's good traction on presence already. 

Cheers, Sameer
p.s. go babo!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey John<br />
&#8220;I see the “presence” issue being a big problem to advancing the Unified Communications area.&#8221;</p>
<p>Can you expand on this? </p>
<p>Whilst its early pickings and certainly not comprehensive (VOIP etc) there&#8217;s good traction on presence already. </p>
<p>Cheers, Sameer<br />
p.s. go babo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
