<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who&#8217;s reading your Unified Communications?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://broaddev.com/2008/06/22/whos-reading-your-unified-communications/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://broaddev.com/2008/06/22/whos-reading-your-unified-communications/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 06:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin Wright</title>
		<link>http://broaddev.com/2008/06/22/whos-reading-your-unified-communications/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 23:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broaddev.com/?p=21#comment-114</guid>
		<description>The Quon case may give employers incentive to broadcast multiple, repetitive privacy disclaimers.  What do you think?  --Ben  &lt;a href="http://hack-igations.blogspot.com/2008/06/employee-imtexte-mailvoicecomputerinter.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://hack-igations.blogspot.com/2008/06/employee-imtexte-mailvoicecomputerinter.html&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Quon case may give employers incentive to broadcast multiple, repetitive privacy disclaimers.  What do you think?  &#8211;Ben  <a href="http://hack-igations.blogspot.com/2008/06/employee-imtexte-mailvoicecomputerinter.html" rel="nofollow">http://hack-igations.blogspot.com/2008/06/employee-imtexte-mailvoicecomputerinter.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ALEX TO &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Who’s reading your Unified Communications?</title>
		<link>http://broaddev.com/2008/06/22/whos-reading-your-unified-communications/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>ALEX TO &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Who’s reading your Unified Communications?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 16:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broaddev.com/?p=21#comment-110</guid>
		<description>[...] Who’s reading your Unified Communications? The answer is a very vague “Everyone and no one”. In Quon v. Arch Wireless the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that employers cannot wiretap or review electronic communications without a warrant. However the method at which they &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Who’s reading your Unified Communications? The answer is a very vague “Everyone and no one”. In Quon v. Arch Wireless the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that employers cannot wiretap or review electronic communications without a warrant. However the method at which they &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
